With editor after decision in process

With editor after decision in process. Since the date of the status has been unchanged also for 2 months, I sent an inquiry to ask about the status of the manuscript a week ago. Once a manuscript is submitted to a journal, it goes through an initial screening process which involves a preliminary review by the journal editor or the editorial board. Once this status shows up, the author is generally informed of the editorial decision in a few days’ time. During this stage, the manuscript is evaluated for ethical considerations and scope match with the readership of the journal. However, since COVID-19, we have seen this stage get longer, going up to three/four weeks or even more. Jan 18, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question. 8. Decision in process: When the Associate editor enters his recommendation (which then is sent to the author by the editor-in-chief). However, as just discussed, there could be either of two decisions. Apr 28, 2019 · The question presupposes that the behavior of such an editorial system has a meaning. By this time we would expect the status to be May 21, 2020 · However, sometimes, it may be that the associate editor (AE), who makes the initial decision on the manuscript, believes it might be a better fit with some other journal by the same publisher (if this is a big publishing house). Yes, it is normal if you wait for a month. Two days after submission, the status changed to with editor. You must have received positive reviews. Next status. After 15 days, the status date changed with the same status. If your manuscript has been in this stage for over three weeks, it's natural to feel a bit on edge. Regrettably, you often do need to remain politely vigilant that the process moves ahead in a timely manner, especially at lower level journals. Pre-submission Enquiries May 29, 2020 · Time is taken to write decision letters, for which my goal is to turnaround within 5 days after receipt of the last review. Timeline It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may Jun 27, 2018 · I submitted a manuscript on April 20, and the status remains unchanged at “Under editorial assessment” till date. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. If the metrics do not appear, then the journal is not yet Jun 22, 2017 · But in some cases, it is possible that the editor makes the decision himself/herself or involves other members of the editorial team instead of sending it out for review. As it is a Springer journal, the editor is likely to have several other manuscripts to go through, and so, may not yet have come to yours. Decision in process: The handling editor has drafted a decision, but it has not yet been finalized or sent to the authors. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding . I fulfilled the revisions and sent the manuscript on 10. Sorted by: 1. Understanding the Decisions. As long as your paper meets the journal Apr 28, 2022 · Decision in Process. this screening is done by the editor. If there was going to be a rejection, after the reviewers grading, your article would have been rejected. Especially when it comes to manuscripts that embody years of work. Granting that presupposition, my first guess is that the editor got the reviewers' reports and was about to make a decision ("decision in process") but then noticed that something was unclear in one of the reports and asked the reviewer for a clearer report ("under review"). I was thrilled because I thought that might mean I'll get an answer quite soon. @Student it means the editor is making a decision and you can expect to receive it within a few Apr 15, 2019 · After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. After one month, it still showed that it was with the editor, but with a different status date. Finally, the editor in Chief finalizes the decision. We can’t really predict the next status update, or when it will be. Share. This step requires you to look for many different solutions for the problem at hand. This depends on the journal, editors and reviewers, but it’s worth signing into the editorial management system and looking at the status of your manuscript. Apr 12, 2022 · Click the action View Reviews and Comments to see all completed reviews and editor decisions. The status ‘Decision in Process After with an Editor’ indicates that the editor has received the peer review reports and is now deliberating on the manuscript’s fate. If the journal clears the initial screening, it is then sent out for peer review. d) transfer to another journal. Answer: After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. If this is the case, the decision could be delayed by another couple of weeks. I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a different editor or sent the manuscript back to the editor. Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average time that a manuscript moves through the submission process from submission to first decision takes about 30 days, and to a final Stage 4: Decision. Once a decision has been reached, you May 10, 2020 · Rather than a reject without reviewing (that is, a desk reject), it perhaps means that the editor is busy for various reasons or has certain challenges. Suggestions are given for starting the writing process, producing a good manuscript, and improving your Aug 10, 2021 · I sent a manuscript to a high reputation Elsevier journal. Jan 11, 2022 · Editor decision phrases are predefined text snippets providing more context for an editorial decision. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Apr 21, 2020 · If not, that is, if they believe the paper is not of great scientific merit, they will convey their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final decision. Only after clearing the initial screening is the manuscript Jun 10, 2020 · As you may know, presently, only the associate editor (AE) seems to have made a decision (which may be a rejection) and communicated this to the EiC. Jan 18, 2016 · Even if the decision in process status takes a couple of weeks more, you have nothing to worry about. I would write to the journal asking for a status update. Decision in Process: This means that the editor is now taking a decision on your paper based on the peer reviewer comments and his/her own opinion. 20. Sep 24, 2019 · On the other hand, if the status changes to “Decision in process,” it implies that the Editor is making the decision on your paper. It is possible that this journal sends out invitations to the editor as soon as a manuscript is submitted, and an admin person conducts the manuscript screening while waiting for the editor to accept the invitation. A summary of the editorial process is given in the Dec 14, 2020 · I had sent a paper to Elsevier. In this part of the series on publishing in a scholarly journal, we focus on the role of the editor and their editorial board in the publishing Sep 3, 2021 · How, when, and why you should appeal an editor’s decision. But now after about ten days from the submission date, it changed to “Decision in Process”. We will Mar 14, 2024 · ‘Pending decision’ means that the Academic Editor is assessing the peer review process. By understanding the editorial process, the individuals involved, and the significance of each step, One idea to improve the effectiveness of the writing would be to provide examples of how editorial decisions can impact the content we see or read. The action appears only if all of the following are true: You Mar 27, 2019 · Thus a direct change from "Editor Assigned to "Decision in process" usually indicates a desk rejection. You may see the action Submit Editor Decision and Comments. Five days after submission, it showed that it was with the editor. Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. This could be a way of speeding up the process, and is probably the reason for the status change to “decision in process. Therefore, when the editor of the journal is waiting to peer reviewers’ feedback to make a wise decision, the status of your paper will be updated to the decision in May 8, 2020 · The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make Mar 3, 2014 · Answer: When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Decision Date: 14 April 2023 Then they sent it to the third review (with no required revision from us) on 20 May 2023. This status indicates that the peer reviewers have completed the review of your revisions and shared the comments with the journal editors. If required, the editor may consult the editorial board at this stage. It is not uncommon for the "Decision in process" status to take several weeks. c) revision. If the Editor-in-Chief decides the paper is within the Journal's remit, the Jul 29, 2019 · The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. This could be for all sorts of reasons, e. Rejection decisions are sent straight to the authors at Associate editors are typically selected by an editor-in-chief and may be chosen through some formal application process or simply by the editor-in-chief identifying and asking that person to serve. Mar 10, 2018 · Presently it is likely that the journal editor is assessing the peer review comments and trying to reach a final decision. However, in your case, the paper was assigned to an editor immediately. Resubmit with minor revisions. Both reviewers asked me to add more literature and enhance the figures' quality. However, your case is a little unusual. Jul 11, 2017 · Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. Authors may request that a specific editor be considered for handling the review If the decision is not to send the manuscript for review, the Editor-in-Chief contacts the author with the decision. What does that mean? Apr 29, 2021 · If the status of your paper has changed to "decision in process" without first changing to "under review", it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. Once the full complement of required feedback has been received, the Academic Editor issues a decision. The decision may need to be confirmed by multiple Editors in some journals, and the Editors may decide to seek additional reviews or assign another Editor, returning the manuscript to an earlier status. When facing rejection, many of us don’t even know that there is a formal process of appealing the decision. The status changed to Nov 4, 2018 · Letters to the editor are generally not sent for external peer review. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Mar 21, 2019 · And if you have not received a decision letter within two months after submission, feel free to ask the Managing Editor what is causing the delay [1, 21]. 2021. 1 Answer. May 29, 2020 · Detailed Question - My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. At this stage when the journal decision is in process, the editor will go through the revised manuscript and your replies to the reviewer comments before coming to a decision. What does this mean? Mar 15, 2016 · Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. Apr 18, 2021 · Editor decided to make a decision before all the reviews have arrived. We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. Nov 7, 2019 · Answer: Normally, a direct change from "With editor" to "Decision in process" implies a desk rejection. The length of the "Decision in Process" phase at PLoS ONE can range widely, taking anywhere from a few days to several weeks. If the article is accepted, authors are able to make Jul 26, 2018 · Answer: Generally, papers that have received a request for major or minor revisions are sent for a second round of peer review. Finding more than one possible alternative is important when it comes to business decision-making, because different stakeholders may have different needs depending on their role. Nov 13, 2017 · The status has not changed from “With Editor” since 2 months after submission. b) reject. We ask Academic Editors to justify their decisions in detail, which is especially important when there is discordance between the reviewers’ comments. 1. However, this status change twithout a review could mean that the paper will get a desk rejection. Note that the EiC typically makes the final decision on the manuscript. It then changed to "With Editor" on 23. This stage may involve Feb 12, 2024 · The academic Editor decision was as follows: Accept after minor revision. In Elsevier, particularly, before this happens, the status of the article shows Decision in Process. a) accept. Click the action Notify Editor to send an email to the current handling editor (last assigned editor who has not made a decision). These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. Awaiting Editor Decision. If it’s suitable for the journal, the editor will send your manuscript to one or more reviewers – experts in your field. I submitted my manuscript via ScholarOne and within 2 days my status went from "editor assigned" to "under review". No, it is not too early. Jan 17, 2024 · Step 3: Identify alternative solutions. After a couple of days, its status changed to “with editor”. The journal editors will scrutinize the reviewers’ comments and run the necessary editorial checks before delivering the final verdict. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Now, after 35 days, the status has changed from With Editor to Decision Under Process. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. 1. Reject. The journal office's message suggests Sep 26, 2021 · Generally, it takes 1-2 weeks for the editorial assessment to be completed. Note: In some journals: the reviewer's assigned status is not there. For those who have contemplated pleading for that precious second chance, we simply don’t I am aware of a case where after more than a month Decision in Progress but after an email to the editor-in-chief, immediately the status change with a final Decision. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. There can be four possible outcomes: Accept; Reject Apr 27, 2022 · Scroll down to and look for the journal metrics displayed after the Aims and Scope. Decision in Process: The decision process may require some time since the editor needs to read the revised manuscript and the revisions/rebuttal from the author to make a decision. I sent an inquiry to the journal and they replied that “we are asking the editor about the status. It does not necessarily imply rejection, so you need not lose hope just yet. Answer: A manuscript can receive any of the following decisions: Accept. After ten days, the status changed to the decision in process. 1) you'll get a decision from one of the following. " However, one of my article which was accepted with minor revision is now under "Editor Invited Please keep in mind that the final decision rests with the Associate Editor, and the reviewers only provide recommendations. It did not go for peer review. You have not mentioned whether your paper has been through any other status before this. The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. This process may take up to 3 Jan 14, 2024 · Decision in Process: This indicates that the peer-review process has been completed, and the editorial team is currently making a decision regarding the fate of the submitted manuscript. Unfortunately I looked Dec 23, 2021 · I have submitted a paper in an Elsevier Journal. Once the AE has completed their review, they will make their decision on the manuscript 2 – 3 First editorial decision. In many cases there is cause for another round of reviews which would loop back to 4 and 5. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. Rejection hurts. If the paper clears the initial screening, it is sent for peer review; else, it is rejected. The peer review process acts as a filter to ensure only good research is published, and improves the quality of research submitted for publication by Feb 12, 2021 · For insights into peer review and journal decision-making that may help address any remaining worries, you may wish to go through the following articles: Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals; How a journal editor reaches a decision on a manuscript after peer review; Hope that helps. Overall, things sound positive, and you should receive the decision soon. 6. Generally, it takes a few days to assign an editor, as the manuscript has to go through an admin check first. Jul 31, 2018 · I submitted my paper to Current Applied Physics on 14. 1 Journal decision-making process Typically, after a paper is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. ' However, for the last 2 months the status hasn’t changed. There are two possibilities. You can select one or more of these generic phrases in EM when you are making a final decision. 3 Time taken to receive your decision. The editor usually reviews these himself/herself and arrives at a decision. The journal editor will make a first decision about your submission. See the screenshot for an example. The timeline of this stage varies across journals. Aug 2, 2023 · Editorial decision-making is a vital process that shapes the content landscape we engage with daily. Sometimes, the editor needs to take the help of the editorial board to come to a decision if he or she is unsure about a paper. Now, again it Oct 18, 2020 · After two months of submission, I received a decision for major revision. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. Oct 14, 2014 · 7. Comments: In my opinion, the manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. 2018 and the status was "Submitted to journal" for almost 10 days. Dec 13, 2017 · 2. Mehdi Heydari. However, since it's been only a week since submission, I doubt that the paper has been through peer review. The status “with editor” for a long duration, such as 5 weeks is certainly unusual. I submitted a paper to one of Elsevier’s journals. 07. But waiting for the decision gets too long. 2 – 3 First editorial decision. Etc. Cite. As it’s happening before peer review, it means the Associate Editor (AE) has gone through the manuscript and decided not to send it for peer review (and has referred this decision to the EIC, who makes Feb 25, 2018 · 1 Answer. Aug 3, 2023 · 2. I submitted a paper on September 7, 2017, and only the date was updated twice (maybe the editor edited) but the status did not change from “With Editor. However, for minor revisions, the editor might make the decision himself/herself instead of sending it out for review once again. Sep 30, 2019 · The graphic below shows how a typical manuscript goes through the Editorial Manager system, along with some of the terms used to describe the manuscript’s status. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. A second major revision was decided. Usually, you will receive a decision letter (email) after ~60 days. Due to the binary nature of IEEE Access, authors will receive an accept or reject decision after the article has completed peer review. At this stage, the editor has to choose any one of the following outcomes for the paper: 1. The first peer review process was completed after one month and a major revision was the decision. the status moves when 2 reviews have arrived, but only one reviewer submitted a review and the editor's making a decision anyway. Then I got the following reply; “At present, the manuscript is still under editorial assessment. 3 Recommendations. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision Jun 18, 2020 · Overall, it has two different stages of editorial procedures: the initial process stage and the review process stage. Delays can occur, especially during busy times or when complex issues arise. ” The status was last updated on September 16. Every editor depends on the cooperation of their editorial board members, the journal’s pool of reviewers and ad hoc reviewers, the journal’s support team as well as the authors for their continued support. A desk rejection after manuscript screening by admin usually occurs if the manuscript does not match the scope of the Nov 20, 2023 · Stage 4: Decision. Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it goes through an initial screening process. Another possibility is that the status description for this journal shows "Decision in process" for revised papers instead of "With editor" during the time the editor is The process of publishing journal articles is examined from the perspective of an editor. These are then automatically pulled into the author decision letter below your signature, generally under “Editor and Reviewer Comments”, where The handling Academic Editor or staff editor makes the final decision on each manuscript. 2018 and then to "Decision in Process" without any mention of peer review in between. Return without review: If the editor finds that the paper does not match Dec 11, 2015 · 1 Answer to this question. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request Oct 11, 2021 · Answer: Thank you for your question. Also, the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision, and their decision might well be different from the AE’s Sep 29, 2014 · 5 mins. Resubmit with major revisions. Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the Editorial Board Member is convinced that the original decision was a serious mistake, such as a referee making substantial errors of fact or showing 2 – 3 First editorial decision. 1 Recommendation. Then in 3 weeks it was "awaiting reviewer reports" and yesterday finally "awaiting editorial decision". Should I have to write an email to an editor about the process for the paper? I am a bit worried if I am giving impressions like urging them. Recently, after a week, the status date changed with the same status ``Decision in process". Apr 7, 2023 · And the decision in the process is before the final stage, meaning that your paper has passed the initial stage successfully and is sent to peer review to evaluate your paper. The length of the process could be dependent on the editor’s workload, for example, or the scope of the journal/SI. In the former stage, when a manuscript is submitted and come into the editorial system—the Springer calls it the ‘Editorial Manager’—the editor-in-chief is to check the similarity score and other related matters—a sort of checking point for possible academic May 19, 2016 · This could be a way of speeding up the process, and is probably the reason for the status change to “decision in process. "Decision in progress" means all the reviews have already been received and what's left is for the editor to make a decision. One of the reviewers also suggested revising for additional data. After Mar 26, 2020 · Coming to your query, Decision in Process typically means that the associate editor (AE) has gone through the peer review comments, arrived at a decision on the manuscript based on the comments, and then conveyed their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Usually the editorial team answers within 4-6 weeks. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should Jul 28, 2016 · However, if the status changes directly to "Decision in process" after "Editor assigned" or "With Editor," it is an indication that your paper might be rejected without review. Click the 'Review Time' link to see to see the average number of weeks it takes for a manuscript to reach first and final decision over the last several years. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. 2) status may turned to "with editor" for Jan 29, 2018 · Answer: A status change directly from "With editor" to "Decision in process" usually implies a desk rejection. The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. Normally journal editors are too busy as they have to manage a large volume of submissions, and hence the final decision can take time. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the Aug 12, 2021 · The PLOS ONE peer review process. If the status remains the same till Aug 23, 2021 · What happens to a manuscript after submission? How does the editor reach a decision? What is the editor’s role during peer review? We take a look into the editorial process at Nature Cancer. Authors are able to monitor the status of their paper throughout the peer review process. After I sent the revised manuscript, the status was ‘’with editor’’ and did not change for two weeks. In my opinion, this status change indicates Nov 4, 2013 · Indeed, it is the journal editor who is considered to be central to the decision making process. As you’ve been waiting for more than a week, you can contact the Assistant Editor for an update. The “Decision Started” status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal’s editorial board is in the process of making a decision. Of course, it also depends on the stature of the journal (top tier in this case, and therefore, likely to take longer), the type of previous revision Editorial decisions at Communications Biology may be made either by in-house editors or Editorial Board Members . When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. But if the status changes to “Decision in process” right after the initial screening, then it unfortunately means that the manuscript will be desk-rejected. All the best for the next update! Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. The two reviewers’ feedback were uploaded on 2 June 2023. 3 weeks is pretty long for this. They may go with the AE’s decision, or they may overturn the AE’s decision and send it to you for a revision. ”. "With editor" means an editor has been assigned, but no reviewers have been invited yet. Required reviews complete: Some or all assigned reviewers have submitted comments. According to editor guideline on springer website "Accept with minor revisions is actually a commitment to ultimately publish the paper, provided the authors answer the remaining concerns (which should be relatively minor) in a timely and proper way. Thus, it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial Sep 11, 2020 · To get to your query straight away, the ‘Decision in Process’ means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) is making a decision on the manuscript. g. Apr 28, 2022 · Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. Through a letter to the editor, I sent the updated manuscript addressing all the comments raised by the reviewers. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. However, as you may know too, the EiC makes the final decision on the manuscript. Good luck! Related reading: After three rounds of review and revision, why is the status "with editor" again? Mar 22, 2016 · Through Elsevier online system I have responded to the journal’s revision request, and after 2 days, the status has changed to 'with editor. 5. The initial consideration usually Jan 24, 2021 · Answer: Until the recent past, the Decision in Process status would last for a week or two. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance that it can still undergo the peer review process? Jun 11, 2018 · Paper status changed to “Decision in Process” rapidly after initial submission. Please The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision. In your case, the status changing from "With Editor" to "Decision in process" implies that the editorial review is probably done and the editor is now making a decision on whether to accept or reject it. Or the editor decided to terminate the review process on the strength of that one review. If the previous editorial decision was B (minor revisions), only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the academic quality of the publication process, including acceptance decisions; the approval of external editors and topics for article collections, such as Special Issues, Topics, and Topical Collections; and appointing new Editorial Board members. You will also find this ebook useful: A guide to understanding journal statuses Apr 5, 2021 · Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. Jul 30, 2019 · At this stage, the status of the manuscript is “Editor assigned” or “With Editor. vf sp qp tn tc gl zq vw jg oo